My Book Picks This Week
Monday, September 29, 2008
First The Raised Your Taxes and Now They Want to Raise Your Children
Michigan Equal Parenting Rally: Michigan Legislators Ready to Press The Button http://www.laryholland.com/serendipity/archives/538-Michigan-Equal-Parenting-Rally-Legislators-are-Ready-to-Press-the-Button.html
Michigan Legislators and Family Rights Organizations Set to Rally on September 23, 2008 http://www.laryholland.com/serendipity/archives/537-Michigan-Legislators-and-Family-Rights-Organizations-Set-to-Rally-Tuesday-September-23,-2008.html
If you want to help out with major action, there is a call to action on the first blog entry above. We need more people to start getting involved with simple action or through contributions to those that are exhausting their resources for the movement. Either take the action or contribute to help us take the action, we make it real simple. It is time to stop waiting for someone else to solve the problem and become part of the solution.
If you don't want to do these tasks today, help me blow out a couple of more fax blasts to all the legislators and their employees, sponsor our telephone campaigns, and assist with mailers to them by pledging a dollar amount to help by sending an email to laryholland@sbcglobal.net and a secure online invoice will be generated for your one time credit card contribution. Be sure to include your pledge amount.
You can also go to our website at http://www.laryholland.com and subscribe for 10.00, 15.00, or 20.00 per month to keep things happening. We need your action or your contribution today. If you want something to happen, you will make it happen. Take the action so I don't have to.
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
LEE PAS Foundation, DC FESTIVAL 2008 Coverage
An amazing representation from the LEE PAS FOUNDATION at the DC FESTIVAL 2008. More information to be found at http://www.familycourtreports.com.
Monday, July 28, 2008
Restraining Orders Out of Control
read more | digg story
Saturday, June 28, 2008
Complaint lodged against family law judge.
read more | digg story
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Other ways to immediately get involved to make a successful civil rights event!
Other ways to immediately get involved to make a successful civil rights event in Washington DC at Upper Senate Park this year. (August 15 & 16 2008)
1. Watch this website frequently. You will notice “recent posts” on the left hand side of this site on all of the pages. You should view these to determine where you need to spread information to and how to do it. Note that the topic might only say “myspace” and spread the information through myspace. If it says “group” then spread the information to yahoo groups or support groups. Likewise, “media releases” go to general media. Finally, if it is an “official statement” then that answers questions from the top. Spread all the information far and wide.
2. Using social networks is critical. You must send out information from this website so that everyone receives the same information. Sign up at some of the social networks like http://www.friendster.com, http://www.myspace.com, http://www.facebook.com and spread self-authored articles that cover the link www.dcfestival2008.com. You can make all the difference just by getting involved with this. Link into all the forums you have access to!
3. Getting Involved means acting. Talk to everyone about this civil rights issue. Use this site as your resource. Spread information at each of the mini events leading up to the historic DC FESTIVAL 2008.
4. Target any type of site that allows comments about parenting issues, news article sites, and professional organizations. Write your own post and include a link to this website: http://www.dcfestival2008.com. If you have a blog, be sure to add this site and let us know immediately, we will add you to our list of sponsors when we receive your letter of support described in #6 of this list.
5. Plan to attend the event! If you can’t attend, you can pledge a donation via email to dcevents@familycourtreports.com and you will receive a credit card invoice via our secure provider. Send the email with PLEDGE: $#.## in the subject line with the amount you with to pledge. It is that simple and goes a long way if you can’t make the event.
6. Get your letter of support of this national civil rights event faxed whether you are an individual, organization, agency, or association. Support letters should be faxed to 989-764-5920 or emailed with a PDF attachment to dcevents@familycourtreports.com. Address them to “Write to Parent” 5119 Highland Rd. #229 Waterford, MI 48327. Include your endorsement as well as the focus of your organization. 1-2 pages. These will be delivered with our national messages to all of Congress.
7. Contact organizations that you would like to see at the event! Exhibition tables are extremely reasonable and we are accepting registrations via our toll-free line at 800-883-9619. Organizations can also fly their banners behind their table or in front.
8. Contact political candidates and ask them if they support our national event! The best way to determine if you are going to vote for a candidate is if they believe in the same issues. Make your issue a voter issue! Support letters should be faxed to 989-764-5920 or emailed with a PDF attachment to dcevents@familycourtreports.com. Address them to “Write to Parent” 5119 Highland Rd. #229 Waterford, MI 48327.
9. Volunteer to help fill a position. Send an email to dcevents@familycourtreports.com if you have time to help. Positions are available in a variety of areas. Every person extends the reach of our national event. There is something for everyone to do. Start by doing some of the things listed at this site and report back to dcevents@familycourtreports.com.
10. Get connected into other groups, organizations, and agencies and spread the word. Network this website and our issues. Simply send copies of our press releases, myspace posts, and more to groups that believe in limited government and protecting parenthood.
There are many other activities that you can assist with. You can subscribe for our weekly conference calls to discuss the issues at this link! Be sure to select DC FESTIVAL 2008 on the check list for announcements.
Saturday, June 21, 2008
Parents Rights Organizations From Across The Nation!
read more | digg story
Friday, May 09, 2008
GET YOUR JUSTICE LIVE is Get Off The Bench: Shows The Real Weapon of Mass Destruction
Get Your Justice Live is an interactive internet talk radio show that focuses on reforming the judiciary, with a special focus on the anti-family courts within the United States. GET YOUR JUSTICE LIVE EVERY WEDNESDAY (8:00pm) and SUNDAY (8:00pm).
Call In: 724-444-7444 TALKCAST ID: 39517
Do you know a Family Court Judge, CPS employee, or Friend Of The Court Counselor that did something wrong and got away with it? Let us know!
Join Our MySpace.Com Page
Our goal is not to work against the system but to work through it and working together there is power in numbers to make a positive change. Tune in!
Sunday, May 04, 2008
TEACHER STUDENT EPIDEMIC
read more | digg story
Monday, April 28, 2008
Brian Holladay and Drew Baden Prepare for National Summit
Two Supporters of Equal Parenting prepare for the 2008 National Fatherhood Summit in Grand Rapids, Michigan earlier this year. Fathers-4-Justice and many other awareness groups promote the need for children to have equal access to both fit, willing, and caring parents.
Nationwide Child Support Enforcement Fails Needy Families
NATIONWIDE | % change | |
Collections Distributed | $24,854,768,488 | 3.8% |
- Current Assistance | $946,283,222 | -4.0% |
- Former Assistance | $9,469,870,384 | 2.5% |
- Never Assistance | $11,322,297,160 | 3.2% |
- Medicaid Assistance | $3,116,317,722 | 13.8% |
Total Expenditures | $5,593,864,242 | 0.6% |
Cost Effectiveness ($ Change) | $4.73 | $0.15 |
Paternities & Acknowledgements | 1,729,141 | 1.7% |
Orders Established | 1,177,589 | 1.6% |
Full Time Equivalent Staff | 60,104 | -0.5% |
Total Caseload | 15,755,322 | -0.6% |
- Current Assistance | 2,136,693 | -8.5% |
- Former Assistance | 7,194,998 | -1.0% |
- Never Assistance | 6,423,631 | 2.9% |
Net Undistributed Collections | $471,977,847 | -2.8% |
Arrears Amounts Due | $107,248,465,839 | -2.0% |
Over participation continues to be a major problem in the nation's child support enforcement program. I have highlighted important sections regarding participation numbers, collections, and undistributed child support. Net Undistributed Collections appears to make up the equivalent of about 50% of the total collections of means tested needy families. These are nationwide numbers. You will see that between former and never assistance, actual needy families are a super minority of this social welfare program.
Adding eligibility requirements into the nation's Title IV-D/Child Support Enforcement Program will benefit needy families and will also constitute a significant savings to the taxpayers at both the federal and state levels. Removing affluent feuding families from the program will also benefit children of those divorce and child custody cases, by emphasizing on the parent-child relationship rather than encouraging bickering and fighting over who is going to receive a check and for how much.
Actual Federal Expenditures Nationwide: $5,593,864,242.00 (Billions)
Estimated State Expenditures Nationwide: $1,845,975,199.86 (Billions)
Taxpayer Expense, not including other social programs and costs of incarcerations is over 7 BILLION DOLLARS!
Collections for ACTUAL MEANS TESTED NEEDY FAMILIES: $946,283,222.00 (Millions) which is less than the State's expenditures on the program nationwide. Why is the federal government getting involved in these cases?
(please note there is no verification to determine if the money was distributed after collection.)
This program would be better off distributing money out of the budget directly to needy families and just get rid of the employees behind the Child Support Enforcement Agency. With Net Undistributed Collections totaling nearly 50% of the amount collected for needy families, one has to wonder how many needy families are indeed being helped by the program.
Sunday, April 27, 2008
ABOUT.COM Covers Story of Fathers Pedaling 758 Mi for Kids
read more | digg story
Monday, April 21, 2008
Hunt for Deadbeats is on in Jackson, Michigan
read more | digg story
Lary Holland: Public Concern Over Definition of Father
Lary Holland
Host and Producer:
Get Off The Bench & Family Court Reports
5199 Highland Rd. Suite 229
Waterford, MI 48327
Hon. Tracey A. Yokich April 9, 2008
40 N. Main St.
Mt. Clemens, MI 48043
RE: Public Concern over Definition of Father
Dear Honorable Tracey A. Yokich,
I have some concerns about the operations of the Macomb County Circuit Court and its definitions. You may or may not remember that in 2005-2006 the Macomb County Referees were only providing 4 days to object to referee recommendation/orders, which was not in compliance with court rule.
Through my initiating a Complaint in the form of a Request for Investigation under MCR 8.113 I took action through the State Court Administrator's Office and subsequently directly through Hon. Clifford Taylor's Office with the Supreme Court. My purpose was to ensure that Macomb County would comply with the statutory 7 days for objection and 21 days for request for de novo hearings upon disagreement with Referees.
In July of 2006, Keith Beasley confirmed that the local court would comply with the court rule and adjusted the local court's practice. This I was grateful for, because many people, especially the tremendous number of "pro per" litigants that you publicly acknowledged, were denied a fundamental access to justice by having such reduced time limits to figure out how to lodge their objections.
It was recently brought to my attention when I came across a video of your court room on "youtube," an online public social networking site for videos, that you provide your own personal definition of a father. To my surprise, what you responded to the litigant with is classical gender bias and is unbecoming of a sitting judge. It would appear that you believe that a father should work as many jobs as it takes while mother is allowed to work only one job to provide "roofs" over the heads of the parties' children. In this situation, I actually have been to home of the father and observed a wonderful roof over their head, and where he has been struggling to provide the best possible environment for the children which go unrecognized by your court room. It would appear there is a greater emphasis with your courtroom for income shifting from one household to the other without much evidentiary proof of its necessity, other than to comply with the funding requirements of Title IV-D of the Social Security Act.
As an expert on Title IV-D of the Social Security (CSE Program), the purpose of the Act was to recuperate the expenses of Title IV-A welfare benefits that the federal government pays to the states, but in the particular case where you lambast the father, he is the individual on Title IV-A (TANF Assistance). Your courtroom has lost site of the best interests of the children in that case and has placed procedural and contractual performances ahead of real judicial discretion. This is unfortunately a very sad day in society where free for all welfare programs like Title IV-D of the Social Security usurp the best interests of the children and allow parents to continue fighting. In the case at hand, both parents should be providing for their own households so they may jointly and equally provide for their own children because both parents are fit, caring, and loving parents. In the situation of a father receiving TANF the court's role should be limited in attempting to carry out contractual performance under Title IV-D as it is directly contrary to the purpose of the act. It is understood for every dollar that is spent on the guise of "child support enforcement" that your local county receives two more dollars. I was integral in ensuring that the financial double-dipping was revoked from the federal statute and it is my goal to remove a significantly larger number of cases from the Title IV-D caseload. This will help judges reclaim real discretion, so that you are not forced to be a cash cow for the local county under the federal program.
I would hope that you take a moment to update your definition of what a father is by referring to many of the numerous resources that are available to you including this one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Father
This will help you understand the importance that this father plays in his children's life, which has nothing to do with supporting the mother's higher standard of living at all, but rather empowering the children through his continued contact with them. It makes little sense to allow two parents to continue fighting over one of the things that likely led them to the initial break-up, being money and power, and do something that places both parents on equal standing ground and nothing more to fight about.
Creating the appearance of an absent household to allow for these type of income shifts is both unethical and detrimental to the relationship of both parties with their own children and only adds to the tremendous caseload that you are juggling on your docket. Let's solve problems instead of contributing to them.
Sincerely,
Lary Holland
722.26a Joint custody.
(6) Joint custody shall not eliminate the responsibility for child support. Each parent shall be responsible for child support based on the needs of the child and the actual resources of each parent. If a parent would otherwise be unable to maintain adequate housing for the child and the other parent has sufficient resources, the court may order modified support payments for a portion of housing expenses even during a period when the child is not residing in the home of the parent receiving support. An order of joint custody, in and of itself, shall not constitute grounds for modifying a support order.
(7) As used in this section, "joint custody" means an order of the court in which 1 or both of the following is specified:
(a) That the child shall reside alternately for specific periods with each of the parents.
(b) That the parents shall share decision-making authority as to the important decisions affecting the welfare of the child.
Friday, February 22, 2008
Michigan Resources: Self-Help Legal Assistance: Know Your Attorney Before Paying!
Don't forget to rate attorneys by following the instructions at this link.
Get Off The Bench Talk Cast! Listen to it while you work!
Attorney Case List
http://courtofappeals.mijud.net/resources/public_acl.htm
The attorney case list can be used to research the types of cases that an attorney has experience with at the court of appeals level. The P(Number) is the number assigned to an attorney when accepted into the State Bar of Michigan. The Attorney Name must be in LAST name FIRST name format. You can check the box for "include closed cases" which is always helpful to see how cases were ruled on.
Search Court of Appeals and Supreme Court Opinions by Key Word
http://courtofappeals.mijud.net/resources/ts.htm
You can search various opinions from both the Court of Appeals or the Michigan Supreme Court opinions by key words and phrases. You can do things like... child custody or parental rights. You can see reasons why orders were overturned, affirmed, or modified.
Michigan Court Rules
http://courtofappeals.mijud.net/rules/
These are the Michigan Court rules arranged by Chapter. If you plan on representing yourself in court, you need to plan on understanding the rules of civil procedure (Chapter 2) and then the applicable Chapter for example... Chapter 3.200 for Domestic Relations Actions.
Michigan Rules of Evidence
http://courtofappeals.mijud.net/rules/documents/2MichiganRulesOfEvidence.pdf
How can you conduct a trial if you don't understand the Rules of Evidence and how to object or what is admissible / inadmissible.
Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct
http://courtofappeals.mijud.net/rules/documents/5MichiganRulesOfProfessionalConduct.pdf
These are the rules of professional conduct for attorneys. These are the rules that THEY must adhere to when representing or advocating for a client. You should know these so you know when you are not being well-represented. Know the rules that attorneys must follow so that when or if they break them, you can take action against them.
The knowledge represented above is invaluable if you plan on self-representation and is only a start for Pro Se Litigants in Michigan. In the past I have published a mini-manual for people that includes Friend of the Court Act, Support and Parenting Time Enforcement Act, and other important pieces like the Michigan Constitution. Let me know if there is still a need for such a resource. I will make them available online for you. If you have more questions send me an email at laryholland@familycourtreports.com.
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Get Your Justice Live with Get Off The Bench
read more | digg story
Saturday, February 02, 2008
Lary Holland on House Joint Resolution NN (2008)
Lary Holland provides a quick information piece on House Joint Resolution NN (2008). Be sure to spread the word and get people contacting their legislators immediately.
Dr. Ron Paul with William Wagener OnSecondThought.Tv
read more | digg story
Monday, January 28, 2008
Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop and Lary Holland Discuss Equal Parenting in Michigan
Hills League of Women Voters Public Town Hall Meeting on January 28, 2008. Michigan currently suffers from the highest unemployment rate, the highest juvenile life sentence rate, and a significant number of incarcerations all related to the breakdown of the Michigan Family. We are seeking to put the family as nearly back together as possible by minimizing the conflict between parents post-divorce, post separation, and post-paternity. Tune in to GetYourJusticeLive.Com for more details on Michigan House Bill 4564 and the happenings in Family Court around the United States.
Lary Holland and House Speaker Andy Dillon at the Farmington Hills League of Women Voters Public Townhall Meeting. Discussing House Bill 4564, Michigan's Presumption of Equal Custody Bill, which will place parents on even footing in child custody disputes unless either parent is unfit, unwilling, or incapable of caring for their children.UPDATE: Andy Dillon and House Democrats: Lawmakers Aim to Cut Deal with Energy Suppliers to Sidestep Voter Approval on Tax Increase

